Re: Portfolio Performance report
[ Q4-Q1 00 Archive ]
[ Current Message Board ]
[ Archives ]
[ Search ]
Posted by Mark on October 31, 1999 at 11:02:57:
In Reply to: Re: Portfolio Performance report posted by Jeff Mounce on October 30, 1999 at 12:10:27:
: : : Hello, : : : I'm using the beta 4.2.207 version and I can't figure out the Total Portfolio %Gain-I number. : : : The %Gain-I for each investment is right on the money but the combined number at the bottom : : : of the report is screwy by my calculations (total portfolio: end value + distributeddistributions : : : + redemptions - purchases/purchases). Any ideas why this number doesn't reflect total portfolio : : : gain. Does it have anything to do with the fact that cash has been put into the account and purchases : : : have been made throughout the history of the acct? : : How are you calculating these items? The purchases, redemptions, and dist : : distributions are the sum of all of these for all open investments. Another : : possibility is that you have some "hidden" investments... : From the Portfolio Performance report I take the following from the bottom line: : end value: 2394.19 : invested 2368.34 : so: 2394.19-2368.34/2368.34 = 1.4% : the bottom line on the report for %Gain-I is .7% : shouldn't these two numbers be equal? No. The %Gain-I is (endvalue + distdist + redempt - purchases)/purchases Invested is purchases - redemptions. : : : In a possibly related question, why in the portfolio/investments overlay graph is the value of my : : : portfolio positive when I the actual value of the portfolio is negative with respect to the starting : : : balance? Does this have something to do with the "weighted average of the performance of each : : : investment"? : : I assume you mean the portfolio value has gone down since the start? The : : starting value for this graph may be higher than your actual money. You : : can adjust the starting hypothetical value for this graph under "Options/ : : Preferences...". : I understand that the starting value may be higher than my actual money, but if : my total gain is negative and I use a starting value of 10000 for the graph, : shouldn't the ending value for the graph be below 10000. For a specific time : period, my total percent gain was -4.01. For the same time period (with original : value set at 100), the graph showed a porfolio value of 99.82, not the 95.99 : value I would have expected if this graph was plotting total gain. Also, what : is the number in parentheses to the right of what I am assuming is total end : value. : Once again, thanks very much for your input. This may be due to rounding errors. This portfolio overlay graph only re-adjusts the percentage contributions from each investment on a daily basis. It then uses these percentages as a weighted average to figure the percent increase/decrease of your portfolio.
: : : : Thanks to anyone who might be able to cast light on this stuff. : : : Jeff
: : Thanks, : : Mark : : -- : : Mark Beiley : : : : Fund Manager for Windows 3.1x/95/98/NT : : : : Thanks, Mark -- Mark Beiley
Fund Manager for Windows 3.1x/95/98/NT
Replies:
|